The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry PMC

While making a decision is itself a mental act, a mental act or event does not cause behaviour alone, but is one part of the complex process between neuronal firing and action. Once an intention has been formed for example, to use substances one is aware of the intention, though intention itself does not sufficiently cause the individual to seek out or use drugs. From a neuroscience perspective, it is difficult to see such actions as completely free, particularly when explanations of natural phenomena are understood as causally ordered.

  • This may allow for less-invasive treatments and interventions, and it can improve the individual’s well-being in a way that non-holistic models overlook.
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
  • Understanding the impact this information has on the person as well as the additive behaviour gives us a clearer picture for positive changes and for the person to actively participate in their recovery and treatment plan.
  • It is likely that repeated use perpetuates anhedonia, and thus interferes with chances of long-term recovery (98).
  • A neurobiological perspective has the potential to provide many benefits to people with addiction in terms of psychopharmacological and other treatment options.
  • The informants who had periods of severe use of substances all talked about demanding situations relating to work, troubled relationships, mental health problems, or loneliness.

The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model.

I argue that, in practice, researchers have often bridged this gap between capacities and expectations with specious arguments that seem to deliver new insights about disease. I refer to these specious arguments, which follow https://thecupertinodigest.com/top-5-advantages-of-staying-in-a-sober-living-house/ certain common patterns, as “wayward” BPSM discourse. Note that a number of more specific versions of the BPSM have been proposed over the years (Bolton and Gillett 2019; Lindau et al. 2003; Wade and Halligan 2017).

Substance misuse, dependence, and/or abuse factors

Third, the authors argue that the apparent resonance between the OPPERA findings and the biopsychosocial approach to jaw pain “confirm[s]” that TMDs have a non-local etiology. Disease and illness (and human experience, syndrome,11 etc.) are not the same thing. The fact that it cannot explain all aspects of illness proves nothing in particular. The lack of attention is especially surprising given Top 5 Advantages of Staying in a Sober Living House the serious questions raised by some existing criticisms of the BPSM. McLaren, Ghaemi, and others have argued that the BPSM is vague and/or devoid of meaningful scientific content (Bolton and Gillett 2019; Ghaemi 2009; McLaren 1998; Van Oudenhove and Cuypers 2014; Weiner 2008). Indeed, McLaren goes so far as to say that, as a scientific model, the BPSM “doesn’t exist” (McLaren 2021, 644).

Complexity and Causality

the biopsychosocial model of addiction

Physicians do not regard every distinctive manifestation of, say, tuberculosis or COVID 19 as a separate disease that gets its own label. In the end, then, Engel’s arguments about the nature of disease and putative benefits of the BPSM seem uncompelling. They also, if accepted, would assign a potentially vast portion of human suffering to medicine, but without improving medicine’s ability to treat that suffering. Adopting this strong position on the BPSM’s capabilities tends to place the researcher in an implicit bind. It creates an expectation that one can and will learn new things about disease by putting the BPSM to work; yet the BPSM itself offers no tools for generating new knowledge.

  • Social processes in addiction are investigated by examining social categories such as networks, groups, organizations and subcultures that alone cannot be explained by neurobiology.
  • This single cohesive framework considers the interdependency of the entire system, drawing its conceptual roots from socio-ecological models (188, 189) including Ecosocial Theory (23).
  • Accordingly, an analysis of the ethical, legal and social issues around other problems of addiction, such as prescription opiate misuse for pain management, may also be examined within the context of our proposed framework.
  • ACEs have been linked to age of opioid initiation, intravenous use of the drug, and lifetime overdose in a graded, dose-response manner (73).
  • There is a paucity of high-quality evidence regarding the role of nutrition in OUD recovery.
  • The models of relationship that have tended to appear in the medical literature, with a few notable exceptions,19 have perhaps focused too much on an analysis of power and too little on the underlying emotional climate of the clinical relationship.

Addiction Neuroethics in the Clinical Context

The prominent belief several decades ago was that addiction resulted from bad choices stemming from a morally weak person. In fact, in 1956, the American Medical Association declared alcoholism a disease that should be addressed with medical and psychological approaches (Mann et al., 2000). Invoking the BPSM and writings of Paolo Freire, they argue that gun violence disease can be attributed to an underlying “disease of oppression” embedded in “our violent society.” “Public health,” they write, “has a role to address the disease of oppression” (Kohlbeck and Nelson 2020, 3). Instead of merely providing public education, health professionals should engage directly in the “dismantling of violent structures of power” and in fostering “liberation” (Kohlbeck and Nelson 2020, 4–5). This effort would entail helping to redistribute resources in society to eradicate the perceived root causes of violence and steering public discourse on violence to align with the authors’ own views (Kohlbeck and Nelson 2020, 4–5).

the biopsychosocial model of addiction

Leave a Comment